The Letters of Paul Andrew Mitchell

He goes by many names, and lays claim to many skills and creations, many of them beyond verification or below the radar of the legal horizon. He considers himself wronged by a snowballing crowd of people inside and outside the courtroom. He feels it is only a matter of time before he will regain what has been taken from him, and that he has only to present his logic and arguments to a forum to be determined later, and all will be right again.
He wants two billion dollars. He wants it now.
He calls himself Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General.

NOTIFICATION OF CLAIMED INFRINGEMENT (October 28, 1998)

In which Paul Mitchell asserts an alleged infringement of copyright on his shareware book

THE FEDERAL ZONE COPYRIGHT AMNESTY PROGRAM (June 9, 2001)

In which Paul Mitchell offers amnesty from two billion dollars in damage for a simple $25 fee

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE AND MIRANDA WARNING (April 23, 2001)

In which Paul Mitchell not only threatens to sue, but sends an abbreviated Miranda Warning by mail

DEMAND FOR IDENTITY OF SUBSCRIBER (May 21, 2001)

In which Paul Mitchell demands to know who exactly he is suing

OFFER TO SETTLE MITCHELL LAWSUIT WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION (October 18, 2001)

In which Lonnie Schmidt can no longer just stand by and ignore this obvious need to send Paul Mitchell money

SECOND DEMAND FOR IDENTITY OF SUBSCRIBER (December 4, 2001)

In which Paul Mitchell, ignored in his first request for a name, demands this name a second time

SUBPEONA TO APPEAR AT CASE CIV S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (January 10, 2002)

In which, for the first time, actual legal documents are used to attempt to subpeona a defendant into the case

FIRST ADJUSTED INVOICE FOR DAMAGES (January 15, 2003)

In which Mitchell indicates that enough time has passed in the last year that even more than $2 billion is needed

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE FOR RACKETEERING AND RELATED CLAIMS (January 20, 2003)

In which Mitchell, rebuffed by the courts, alleges everyone is against him

CLICK HERE TO SEE PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL'S COMPLAINT